Paper on Unfreedom vs Inability available here
Summary
Our conversation explores the concept of enhancement and its implications. It discusses the distinction between enhancement and treatment, the potential negative impact of enhancement, and the societal perspective on enhancement. We examine the relationship between enhancement and human limits, the idea of unfreedom versus inability, and the potential implications of bio enhancement on freedom. The conversation raises concerns about new forms of ableism and the responsibility of the scientific and academic communities in the development of new technologies.
Key Takeaways
We need to critically question the social narratives around enhancement and consider the wider societal effects.
Enhancements are not always positive, and we need to be prepared to have conversations to ensure that the drive for ‘more is better’ does not get in the way of the potential to enhance society as a whole.
Recognising the potential implications of bioenhancement on freedom and the concerns about new forms of ableism is vital to ensure that conversations surrounding ‘normalised bodies’ do not go unheard.
Key questions we explore:
How broadly should we define "enhancement"?
Are bioenhancements inherently "good"? Can they actually diminish our humanity?
How do cosmetic and pharmaceutical enhancements challenge societal norms and ethics?
When does "moving the goalposts" actually limit our choices and freedoms?
Could bioenhancement lead to a "new ableism" and a reinforcement of a concept of a normative body?
Connect with Ji-Young:
Website: https://jyleephilosophy.wordpress.com/
Publications: https://philpeople.org/profiles/ji-young-lee
Ep.3: Does bioenhancement make us more or less free? With Dr. Ji-Young Lee